|
ABOUT REMITTANCES
Remittances are the monies that migrants return to the country
of origin. If labor is considered an export, than remittances
are that part of the payment for exporting labor services that
returns to the country of origin.
Three streams of money flowing into countries are included in
remittances, and published annually by the IMF in its Balance
of Payments Statistics Yearbook:
worker remittances are the value of monetary transfers sent home
from workers abroad more than one year,
compensation of employees (previously labor income) are the gross
earnings of foreigners residing abroad for less than 12 months,
including the value of in-kind benefits such as housing and payroll
taxes
migrant transfers are the net worth of migrants who move from
one country to another--the value of IBM stock owned by a migrant
who moves from France to Germany gets transferred in international
accounting from France to Germany.
Total remittances--the sum of workers remittances, compensation
of employees, and migrants transfers--increased from less than
$2 billion in 1970 to $70 billion in 1995. Growth in total remittances
was erratic from year to year. Remittances doubled between 1974
and 1975, and continued rising sharply in the mid-1970s, as workers
poured into Middle Eastern oil exporting nations. Total remittances
were flat in the early 1980s, resumed their growth in the late
1980s, and then stablilized in the 1990s at $60 to $70 billion;
remittances were $67 billion or more in 1990, 1994, and 1995.
Between 1970 and 1995, total remittances were almost $1 trillion.
Almost two-thirds of total remittances over the past 15 years
were worker remittances, 25 percent were compensation of employees,
and almost 10 percent were migrant transfers. The worker remittances
share of total remittances peaked in the early 1980s at over 70
percent.
It should be emphasized that remittance data are generally under
reported, and that the IMF estimates the remittances accruing
to countries that report late or do not report, so that published
world and regional remittances are larger than those reported
for individual countries. For example, worker remittance credits
for Asia in the 1995 Yearbook are reported to be $11 billion,
even though the sums for the listed countries total $3.3 billion,
with no remittances listed for India and Pakistan.
The country receiving the most worker remittances--from those
abroad more than 12 months-- in 1995 was Portugal, with $3.8 billion,
followed by Mexico ($3.7 billion), Turkey ($3.3 billion), and
Egypt ($3.2 billion). Egypt received the largest single year amount
of workers' remittances--$6.1 billion in 1992.
Developing countries received $35 billion in workers remittances
in 1995, up from $31 billion in 1994. Eight developing countries
accounted for half of 1995 workers remittances--Mexico ($3.7 billion),
Turkey ($3.3 billion), Egypt ($3.2 billion), Brazil ($2.9 billion),
Morocco ($1.9 billion), Bangladesh ($1.2 billion), Yemen ($1.1
billion), and El Salvador ($1.1 billion). 1995 data for three
countries that traditionally receive over $1 billion in remittances
are missing, but Pakistan had $1.7 billion and Jordan $1.1 billion
in remittances in 1994, and India $2.9 billion in 1992.
Five countries paid 80 percent of workers remittances in 1995--Saudi
Arabia $16.6 billion, US $12.2 billion, Germany $5.3 billion,
France $3.1 billion, and UK $2.7 billion. Kuwait paid $1.8 billion,
and Oman $1.3 billion in workers remittances in 1995.
Compensation of employees--what the IMF termed labor income until
1995--are funds transferred to countries of origin by nationals
who have been abroad less than 12 months. Compensation of employees
was $25 billion in 1995, including $4.9 billion sent to the Philippines,
$4.4 billion each to France and Germany, and $1.7 billion each
to Thailand and Italy. Migrants transfers were $9.5 billion in
1995, with Russia receiving $2.3 billion, New Zealand $1.7 billion,
Israel $1.4 billion, and Australia $1.3 billion--these four countries
accounted for two-thirds of migrant transfers.
Since some labor-exporting countries report workers remittances,
and others report compensation of employees, it may be better
to examine total remittances. For example, Mexico reported $3.7
billion in workers' remittances in 1994, and $650 million in compensation
of employees, while the Philippines reported $440 million in workers'
remittances, and $3 billion in compensation of employees.
Total remittances show that France received more from residents
abroad than any other country in 1994, largely because France
received $3.7 billion in compensation of employees. The top five
countries in total remittances--France, Mexico, Portugal, Egypt,
and the Philippines--accounted for about one-third of total remittances
in 1994, and the top 10--these five plus Greece, Turkey, Italy,
Brazil, and Pakistan--accounted for almost half of total remittances.
The US and the UK are in the IMF data base, but the US had $160
million in compensation of employees reported for 1995, the UK
zero, and Germany $4.4 billion.
There are several other ways to examine remittances, including
the ratio of remittances to merchandise exports, and remittances
per capita. In 1994, island places such as Cape Verde were most
likely to have remittances exceed exports--by 16 to 1 in Cape
Verde--and remittances exceeded exports in the Dominican Republic.
Total remittances per capita were highest in New Zealand, $411,
followed by Portugal, $407, and St Kitts, $385.
Remittances are very important for many island economies, as well
as for populous nations including Egypt, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.
In 1994, total remittances were equivalent to more than 100 percent
of merchandise exports for the Dominican Republic, over 75 percent
of merchandise exports in Egypt, El Salvador, and Jordan, more
than 50 percent of merchandise exports in Yemen and Greece, and
25 percent or more of merchandise exports in Bangladesh, the Philippines,
and Pakistan. In Turkey and Mexico, total remittances were equivalent
to 14 and 12 percent of merchandise exports in 1994.
Total remittances have not declined as migration streams "matured"
in Turkey, Egypt, and many other labor-exporting nations. There
are many reasons, including the fact that the willingness of migrants
to remit depends on economic and savings policies in the host
and home countries, exchange rate and risk factors, and the availability
and efficiency of transfer facilities. In some emigration countries,
changed economic policies encouraged migrants to send home more
remittances; in other cases, simply making it easier or cheaper
to send money home has increased and/or sustained remittances.
|